The Mind of God: Neuroscience, Faith, and a Search for the Soul

5 2154 3813
The Mind of God: Neuroscience, Faith, and a Search for the Soul

The Mind of God: Neuroscience, Faith, and a Search for the Soul

2018-02-20 The Mind of God: Neuroscience, Faith, and a Search for the Soul

Description

For fans of Deepak Chopra, Rudy Tanzi, and Andrew Newberg. It is neuroscience, the author contends, and how we and our brains interpret what's going on around us that can lead us to a deeper and more fulfilling faith. With cutting-edge research and provocative case studies, renowned behavioral neurologist provides insights to some of the most curious spiritual questions of mortality.. In The Mind of God, Dr. You would think by now we'd have a satisfactory, universal answer. Lombard employs case studies from

Frank Riley said Interesting but not complete. I found it interesting but it seemed to relate to the spiritual side when it involved a mishap in our brain like stroke or dementia, maybe that was the limit of experience. I would have like to have seen more positive relations.. Great read ! I gave this book 5 stars for it's information and readability. I recommend it to anyone who wants to improve their brain functionThis is not a book about religion. It is about the neurological changes in our brain produced when we think about God. The authors are researchers and have backed up their claims with plenty of scientific proof --- which they present in an easy to understand manner. This book is more than just a bunch of info collected by brain re. Walt Chambers said Never Mind This Book. Early in the book when the author says that the earth was "a custom-made planet that is sublimely ordered to afford the probability of life", "to accommodate us" warning bells went off.A little later, he describes evolution as "survival of the fittest", and as such could not have produced empathy and compassion in humans. The conclusion is that empathy and compassion are somehow proof of God. This understanding of evolution is immature, and simple wrong. C